Simple view
Full metadata view
Authors
Statistics
Kontrowersje wokół herezji XI wieku
herezje
XI w.
Orlean
Arras
Monteforte
Châlons-Sur-Marne
heresis
11th century
Orlean
Arras
Monteforte
Châlons-Sur-Marne
The article presents one of the most controversial issues in the history of the medieval heresies - the issue of the eleventh-century heresies - those discovered in Aquitaine (1016-1018), Orléans (1022), Arras (1025), Monteforte (1028-1040), Châlons-sur-Marne (1043-1048) and Goslar (1051). Their origins and character have been highly controversial since the middle of the 20th century. The article presents the conceptions of scholars, adherents of the two main streams of interpretation. The first of them was started by the works of the French Dominican historian Antoine Dondaine, who claimed that these heresies were dualistic in nature and were seriously influenced by the eastern heresies of this kind, mainly Bogomilism. The second one was created by the Italian Medievalist Raffaello Morghen, who believed that eleventh-century heresies were a genuine invention of the Westerners, trying to revive early, pure Christianity, based on the testimony of the New Testament. He and his followers deny their dualistic character. Besides these two streams, the article also presents the conceptions of the scholars belonging to the deconstructionist school, which has recently become more and more popular. Its adherents completely deny the existence of the eleventh-century heresies, claiming that in fact they were invented by the Church authors, trying to discredit the innocent reformers.
cris.lastimport.scopus | 2024-04-07T17:18:08Z | |
cris.lastimport.wos | 2024-04-09T23:17:02Z | |
dc.abstract.en | The article presents one of the most controversial issues in the history of the medieval heresies - the issue of the eleventh-century heresies - those discovered in Aquitaine (1016-1018), Orléans (1022), Arras (1025), Monteforte (1028-1040), Châlons-sur-Marne (1043-1048) and Goslar (1051). Their origins and character have been highly controversial since the middle of the 20th century. The article presents the conceptions of scholars, adherents of the two main streams of interpretation. The first of them was started by the works of the French Dominican historian Antoine Dondaine, who claimed that these heresies were dualistic in nature and were seriously influenced by the eastern heresies of this kind, mainly Bogomilism. The second one was created by the Italian Medievalist Raffaello Morghen, who believed that eleventh-century heresies were a genuine invention of the Westerners, trying to revive early, pure Christianity, based on the testimony of the New Testament. He and his followers deny their dualistic character. Besides these two streams, the article also presents the conceptions of the scholars belonging to the deconstructionist school, which has recently become more and more popular. Its adherents completely deny the existence of the eleventh-century heresies, claiming that in fact they were invented by the Church authors, trying to discredit the innocent reformers. | pl |
dc.affiliation | Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Religioznawstwa | pl |
dc.contributor.author | Czarnecki, Piotr - 161425 | pl |
dc.date.accession | 2017-01-27 | pl |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-27T10:11:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-27T10:11:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | pl |
dc.date.openaccess | 0 | |
dc.description.accesstime | w momencie opublikowania | |
dc.description.number | 2 | pl |
dc.description.physical | 99-117 | pl |
dc.description.points | 12 | pl |
dc.description.publication | 1,39 | pl |
dc.description.series | Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego | |
dc.description.version | ostateczna wersja wydawcy | |
dc.description.volume | 49 | pl |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4467/20844077SR.16.007.5228 | pl |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2084-4077 | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 0137-2432 | pl |
dc.identifier.project | ROD UJ / P | pl |
dc.identifier.seriesissn | 0860-0139 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/36233 | |
dc.identifier.weblink | http://www.ejournals.eu/Studia-Religiologica/Tom-49-2016/Numer-49-2-2016/art/7532/ | pl |
dc.language | pol | pl |
dc.language.container | pol | pl |
dc.rights | Dozwolony użytek utworów chronionych | * |
dc.rights.licence | OTHER | |
dc.rights.uri | http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/4dspace/License/copyright/licencja_copyright.pdf | * |
dc.share.type | otwarte czasopismo | |
dc.subject.en | heresis | pl |
dc.subject.en | 11th century | pl |
dc.subject.en | Orlean | pl |
dc.subject.en | Arras | pl |
dc.subject.en | Monteforte | pl |
dc.subject.en | Châlons-Sur-Marne | pl |
dc.subject.pl | herezje | pl |
dc.subject.pl | XI w. | pl |
dc.subject.pl | Orlean | pl |
dc.subject.pl | Arras | pl |
dc.subject.pl | Monteforte | pl |
dc.subject.pl | Châlons-Sur-Marne | pl |
dc.subtype | Article | pl |
dc.title | Kontrowersje wokół herezji XI wieku | pl |
dc.title.alternative | Controversies over heresies of the 11th century | pl |
dc.title.journal | Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Studia Religiologica | pl |
dc.type | JournalArticle | pl |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.
Views
0
Views per month
Downloads
Open Access