Wiek emerytalny w sprawach przed Trybunałem Sprawiedliwości UE

2012
journal article
article
8
1
cris.lastimport.scopus2024-04-24T04:49:15Z
dc.abstract.enThe article contributes to the debate on ageing, the compulsory retirement and the limits of the economic activity that are currently observed in Poland and in Europe. The Author indicates demographic and sociological transformations in the contemporary world as well as the need to adapt legal solutions to the new social conditions. She analyses the relevant provisions of Directive 2000/78/EC, particularly its Art. 6 stating that differences of treatment on grounds of age shall not constitute discrimination, if, within the context of national law, they are objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim, including legitimate employment policy, labour market and vocational training objectives, and if the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary. Each Member State adopts its own solutions in area of employment and regulates its labour market. Sometimes these legal solutions are unclear in the light of requirements provided in Article 6 of the Directive. Therefore, national judges more and more often apply to the EU Court of Justice for the preliminary rulings in cases related to the compulsory retirement. The article invokes and analyses such cases and the Court's opinions. The Author concludes that taking into account the different economic and social aspects of ageing and the opinions of the Court, modern Europe needs a new approach to understanding of the retirement age. This new approach should be more flexible and it should overcome stereotypes in the field of treatment of the people called older workers (50 +, 60 +, etc.) in the labour market.pl
dc.contributor.authorMikołajczyk, Barbarapl
dc.date.accession2020-02-26pl
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T11:15:57Z
dc.date.available2020-02-26T11:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2012pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.physical9-20pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume10pl
dc.identifier.doi10.26106/qcm1-bh25pl
dc.identifier.issn1730-4504pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / OPpl
dc.identifier.urihttps://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/150205
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://www.europeistyka.uj.edu.pl/documents/3458728/31c07386-bf8c-4441-9482-d0b68b824b76pl
dc.languagepolpl
dc.language.containerpolpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowa*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-SA
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.pl*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titleWiek emerytalny w sprawach przed Trybunałem Sprawiedliwości UEpl
dc.title.alternativeRetirement age in the EU court of justice's jurisprudencepl
dc.title.journalProblemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczegopl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
0
Views per month