Promoting eyewitness testimony quality : warning vs reinforced self-affirmation as methods of reduction of the misinformation effect

2013
journal article
article
11
cris.lastimport.wos2024-04-10T02:07:45Z
dc.abstract.enIn a typical experiment on the misinformation effect, subjects first watch some event, afterwards read a description of it which in the experimental group includes some incorrect details, and answer questions relating to the original event. Typically, subjects in the misled experimental group report more false details than those from the control group. The main purpose of the presented study was to compare two methods of reducing the misinformation effect, namely - warning against misinformation and reinforced self-affirmation. The reinforced self-affirmation consists of two elements: the participants recall their greatest achievements of life, and are being given a positive feedback about their performance in a memory task. The obtained results showed that the reinforced self-affirmation was more effective than warning, although the latter also caused a significant reduction of the vulnerability to misinformationpl
dc.affiliationWydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Psychologiipl
dc.contributor.authorSzpitalak, Malwina - 122680 pl
dc.contributor.authorPolczyk, Romuald - 131496 pl
dc.date.accession2019-03-12pl
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-09T09:51:19Z
dc.date.available2015-07-09T09:51:19Z
dc.date.issued2013pl
dc.date.openaccess0
dc.description.accesstimew momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalBibliogr. s. 90-91pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.physical85-91pl
dc.description.versionostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volume44pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ppb-2013-0009pl
dc.identifier.eissn1641-7844pl
dc.identifier.issn0079-2993pl
dc.identifier.projectROD UJ / Ppl
dc.identifier.urihttp://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/12224
dc.identifier.weblinkhttp://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/114682/edition/99735/contentpl
dc.languageengpl
dc.language.containerengpl
dc.rightsUdzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.licenceCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode*
dc.share.typeotwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enmisinformation effectpl
dc.subject.enwarningpl
dc.subject.enreinforced self-affirmationpl
dc.subject.eneyewitness testimonypl
dc.subject.enreducing misinformation effectpl
dc.subtypeArticlepl
dc.titlePromoting eyewitness testimony quality : warning vs reinforced self-affirmation as methods of reduction of the misinformation effectpl
dc.title.journalPolish Psychological Bulletinpl
dc.typeJournalArticlepl
dspace.entity.typePublication
cris.lastimport.wos
2024-04-10T02:07:45Z
dc.abstract.enpl
In a typical experiment on the misinformation effect, subjects first watch some event, afterwards read a description of it which in the experimental group includes some incorrect details, and answer questions relating to the original event. Typically, subjects in the misled experimental group report more false details than those from the control group. The main purpose of the presented study was to compare two methods of reducing the misinformation effect, namely - warning against misinformation and reinforced self-affirmation. The reinforced self-affirmation consists of two elements: the participants recall their greatest achievements of life, and are being given a positive feedback about their performance in a memory task. The obtained results showed that the reinforced self-affirmation was more effective than warning, although the latter also caused a significant reduction of the vulnerability to misinformation
dc.affiliationpl
Wydział Filozoficzny : Instytut Psychologii
dc.contributor.authorpl
Szpitalak, Malwina - 122680
dc.contributor.authorpl
Polczyk, Romuald - 131496
dc.date.accessionpl
2019-03-12
dc.date.accessioned
2015-07-09T09:51:19Z
dc.date.available
2015-07-09T09:51:19Z
dc.date.issuedpl
2013
dc.date.openaccess
0
dc.description.accesstime
w momencie opublikowania
dc.description.additionalpl
Bibliogr. s. 90-91
dc.description.numberpl
1
dc.description.physicalpl
85-91
dc.description.version
ostateczna wersja wydawcy
dc.description.volumepl
44
dc.identifier.doipl
10.2478/ppb-2013-0009
dc.identifier.eissnpl
1641-7844
dc.identifier.issnpl
0079-2993
dc.identifier.projectpl
ROD UJ / P
dc.identifier.uri
http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/12224
dc.identifier.weblinkpl
http://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/114682/edition/99735/content
dc.languagepl
eng
dc.language.containerpl
eng
dc.rights*
Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
dc.rights.licence
CC-BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.uri*
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode
dc.share.type
otwarte czasopismo
dc.subject.enpl
misinformation effect
dc.subject.enpl
warning
dc.subject.enpl
reinforced self-affirmation
dc.subject.enpl
eyewitness testimony
dc.subject.enpl
reducing misinformation effect
dc.subtypepl
Article
dc.titlepl
Promoting eyewitness testimony quality : warning vs reinforced self-affirmation as methods of reduction of the misinformation effect
dc.title.journalpl
Polish Psychological Bulletin
dc.typepl
JournalArticle
dspace.entity.type
Publication
Affiliations

* The migration of download and view statistics prior to the date of April 8, 2024 is in progress.

Views
19
Views per month
Views per city
Des Moines
6
Ashburn
2
Wroclaw
2
Bayreuth
1
Chandler
1
Dublin
1
Warsaw
1
Downloads
szpitalak_polczyk_promoting_eyewitness_testimony_quality_2013.pdf
8
szpitalak_polczyk_promoting_eyewitness_testimony_quality_2013.odt
6